RuleOne

← Learn · Module: Case studies and interviews

375 · Netflix (Part 2)

2022-06-29 · 32 minUnderstandLoveEvent

In one sentence: With Netflix down about two-thirds, Phil and Danielle use it to show how infatuation with a company breeds confirmation bias, why moat and management matter more than "hang-nail" flaws, and why the real question is whether the content flywheel (and its free cash flow) still works.

Key ideas

How it maps to RuleOne

Buffett, Munger and Graham links

Words to know

Try this

Pick a company you're excited about on /stocks/. Write down three flaws, then label each a hang-nail or a broken arm by asking whether it damages the moat. Don't tell anyone about the idea for a month.

Check yourself

  1. What does Danielle do when she feels infatuated with a company?
    AnswerShe notices the feeling, assumes there are layers she doesn't see, reads more, and doesn't broadcast her enthusiasm.
  2. How do you tell a hang-nail problem from a broken arm?
    AnswerAsk whether it damages the moat or the durability of the business's earnings.
  3. Why does Netflix's free cash flow look so small next to Apple's?
    AnswerNetflix capitalises content and spends the cash on new shows, whereas Apple expenses R&D and keeps a larger share of cash.

Short quotes

"Confirmation bias is a disease that strikes investors everywhere and you must find some way to immunize yourself against it." (Phil, ~02:20, auto-transcribed)

netflixconfirmation biastoo hard pilemoatmanagementflywheeleventsfree cash flowamortizationcase study

Saved in this browser

AI study notes from an automatic transcript. Names and figures may be misheard, and quotes are short excerpts for study. Not investment advice.