RuleOne

← Learn · Module: Case studies and interviews

374 · Netflix

2022-06-21 · 40 minUnderstandStory

In one sentence: Phil and Danielle take on Netflix, whose lack of free cash flow is a Rule #1 red flag, and ask how much of its roughly $20 billion content spend is maintenance versus growth, flagging the four-year depreciation schedule as the hinge for next week.

Key ideas

How it maps to RuleOne

Buffett, Munger and Graham links

Words to know

Try this

On /stock/NFLX/ or the latest 10-K, find capital expenditures and content spending. Compute owner earnings twice: once at 70% maintenance and once at 100%. Write down which assumption you'd defend and why.

Check yourself

  1. Why is a lack of free cash flow a red flag?
    AnswerEarnings can be an accounting fiction; without leftover cash, nothing reaches owners and the business may only be replacing what it uses.
  2. What default does Phil use for maintenance capex when a company doesn't say?
    Answer70% of capital spending, or 100% for conservatism.
  3. Why does the four-year write-off matter?
    AnswerIt is a negotiated number that may understate or overstate how long content really earns, changing how much counts as maintenance.

Short quotes

"Earnings are sort of a fictional accounting number. Whereas cash in the bank is money you can actually use." (Phil, ~02:30, auto-transcribed)

netflixfree cash flowowner earningsmaintenance capexgrowth capexnetwork moatflywheeldepreciationcontent amortizationcase study

Saved in this browser

AI study notes from an automatic transcript. Names and figures may be misheard, and quotes are short excerpts for study. Not investment advice.