RuleOne

← Learn · Module: Portfolio and selling

215 · What Stocks to Buy for Your Children?

2019-05-28 · 36 minStoryReduce basis

In one sentence: Phil and Danielle work through what to buy for a baby with a couple of thousand dollars and no investing knowledge, and conclude that an index is the default, but that valuation (the Shiller PE) can shape a 20-year outcome and that learning to invest is the better route.

Key ideas

How it maps to RuleOne

Buffett, Munger and Graham links

Words to know

Try this

Take $2,000 and calculate its value after 21 years at 10%, 5% and 2% a year. Then compare with the idea of holding to 60 years. Next, open /stocks/ and find one long-lived company you would be happy to leave to a child. List the reasons it should still be strong in 25 years.

Check yourself

  1. Why do Phil and Danielle favour an index for someone who won't learn?
    AnswerIt removes single-stock risk and the emotional turmoil, especially fear, that makes people sell at the wrong time.
  2. What does a high Shiller PE imply for a 20-year holding period?
    AnswerHistorically, starting at 25 or higher has made a 10% annual return over 20 years very unlikely; outcomes were more like 2–3% on average.
  3. What is Phil's "third level" of advice?
    AnswerLearn to invest properly while the child grows up, so you can buy businesses you understand.

Short quotes

"Buy and hold is really good advice as long as hold means 40 to 60 years." (Phil, ~21:00, auto-transcribed)

index investingspyroth irashiller pedollar cost averagingtime horizonfear vs knowledgeheads i winberkshire successionsmall capscompoundingfinancial literacy

Saved in this browser

AI study notes from an automatic transcript. Names and figures may be misheard, and quotes are short excerpts for study. Not investment advice.