RuleOne

← Learn · Module: Portfolio and selling

130 · Ignorance is Not Bliss

2017-10-03 · 25 minRadarUnderstand

In one sentence: Active versus passive investing: index funds beat most fee-heavy managed funds and are Buffett's advice for people who won't do the work, but Phil argues that if everyone indexes, the market becomes more fragile, and that fragility is an opportunity for a Rule #1 investor holding cash and a watch list.

Key ideas

How it maps to RuleOne

Buffett, Munger and Graham links

Words to know

Try this

Take a number you pay in fund fees (or imagine a 1.5% fee) and run $10,000 for 30 years at 7% versus 5.5%. Then open /stocks/ and pick the one stock you would rather own than the index and write down why.

Check yourself

  1. Why can a fund you do nothing with still be "active"?
    AnswerThe label describes what the fund tries to do (beat the index), not your own effort.
  2. What is Phil's worry about the rise of index money?
    AnswerPrices become driven by flows and not by earnings, so a panic could force heavy selling and big falls.
  3. Why can that be good for a Rule #1 investor?
    AnswerWonderful businesses go on sale at low prices, and with cash on hand you can buy them with a margin of safety.

Short quotes

"The market goes up like a staircase and down like an elevator." (Phil, ~11:30, auto-transcribed)

active vs passiveindex fundsfeesvolatilityanti fragilemargin of safetyten ten rulecontrarian

Saved in this browser

AI study notes from an automatic transcript. Names and figures may be misheard, and quotes are short excerpts for study. Not investment advice.