RuleOne

← Learn · Module: Valuation and margin of safety

052 · Capitalization Rate (Part 3)

2016-04-05 · 41 minUnderstandLoveEventRadar

In one sentence: Phil argues that 10% is a sensible bar by pointing to two Buffett deals (a New York building and a farm) bought at roughly a 10% cap rate after events forced sellers, and he contrasts that with bonds, where a high yield really does signal more risk.

Key ideas

How it maps to RuleOne

Buffett, Munger and Graham links

Words to know

Try this

Open the All stocks page and sort by recent drawdown. For one name you understand, write two lines: what event hit it, and is the seller's reason financial or does it change the business?

Check yourself

  1. Why does a cap rate ignore the mortgage?
    AnswerDebt is a financing choice, so excluding it keeps deals comparable on the business alone.
  2. What makes a sub-optimal property attractive?
    AnswerIts income is already below potential, so the 10% starting return can mostly only improve.
  3. Why is a 10% bond yield a warning when a 10% business yield may not be?
    AnswerA high bond yield pays for default risk. A durable business bought cheaply after an event can earn it with less risk.

Short quotes

"You don't make money when you buy, you don't make money when you sell, you make money because you can wait." (Phil, citing Munger, ~28:00, auto-transcribed, lightly paraphrased)

cap rateeventsbuffett case studiesmargin of safetyequity bondrisk vs volatilityaccrual vs cashspeculation vs investingetf risk

Saved in this browser

AI study notes from an automatic transcript. Names and figures may be misheard, and quotes are short excerpts for study. Not investment advice.