RuleOne

← Learn · Module: Case studies and interviews

033 · Real Estate, Warren Buffett's Farm, and NYC Building

2015-11-24 · 53 minUnderstandEvent

In one sentence: Real estate is investable by the same rules as stocks (understand it, find a durable edge, buy it cheap after a bust), and Buffett's Nebraska farm and New York building show a cash-flow return, a bust seller and a margin of safety working together.

Key ideas

How it maps to RuleOne

Buffett, Munger and Graham links

Words to know

Try this

Open a stock you know on /stock/TICKER/ and compute its earnings yield (earnings per share ÷ price). Write down whether it beats the 10-year Treasury yield by a margin like Phil's 6% / 8% / 15% ladder, and name its "location": the one thing about it that can't be copied.

Check yourself

  1. Why does a building at an 8% yield beat one at 6%?
    AnswerThe same $8,000 of income is worth about $130,000 at a 6% cap rate, so buying at $100,000 gives you a built-in discount (margin of safety).
  2. What was the "problem" with Buffett's NYC building, and why was it still a buy?
    Answer20% of it was let at $5 a foot against a $70 market, and a lot was empty. He bought it for a price that worked on current rents, with a later re-let as upside.
  3. Why is Phil comfortable with diversification across asset groups but not within stocks?
    AnswerAcross asset groups it hedges different economic conditions. Within stocks he sees it as a cover for not knowing values.

Short quotes

"We know what we know, and the thing that makes us different is we also know what we don't know." (Phil, paraphrasing Munger, ~14:30, auto-transcribed)

real estatecap rateall weather portfoliodiversificationbuffett farmbuffett nyc buildingcircle of competencemoatmargin of safetyscuttlebutt

Saved in this browser

AI study notes from an automatic transcript. Names and figures may be misheard, and quotes are short excerpts for study. Not investment advice.